AppCrumble mascotAppCrumble
GrowthPricingConversionCopywriting

Why We Killed Every Fake Discount on Our Pricing Page

Countdown timers, crossed-out "original" prices, forced annual toggles - pricing pages have accumulated a lot of theater. We cut all of it. Here's what stayed.

September 8, 20266 min read

"Simple pricing, without the usual SaaS theatrics" is a line we use to describe the Pricing Card on this very site. It's also a decent one-sentence brief for the page it sits on. Pricing pages have accumulated a lot of theater over the years, and most of it is worth cutting.

What to cut

  • Countdown timers on a page that's been live for eight months.
  • A crossed-out "original" price next to a number that's always been the number.
  • An annual toggle that's pre-selected and styled so the monthly option looks like the wrong choice.
  • Feature lists padded with things every plan already includes, just to make the list look longer.

None of it is dishonest exactly - it's just noise standing between a visitor and the two facts they actually came for: what does it cost, and what do I get.

Anchoring, used honestly

Price anchoring - showing one number so a second number looks better by comparison - is a real and well-documented effect on how people judge value, and there's nothing wrong with using it. The dishonest version invents a reference point that never existed: a "was $49" next to a price that has always been $29. The honest version anchors against something true - an annual plan genuinely priced at ten months instead of twelve, stated plainly as "two months free," with the arithmetic anyone can check against the monthly price sitting right next to it.

Three tiers, not five

Hick's Law - the finding that decision time increases with the number and complexity of choices - is a big part of why most SaaS pricing settles on three tiers rather than five or six. A cheap entry point, a middle tier that's clearly the one most people should pick, and a ceiling for the handful of power users who need it. Extra tiers don't make the product look more capable; they mostly just make the page take longer to read before anyone commits to a plan at all.

What actually earns its place

A plan name that means something. One sentence describing who the plan is for, not just what's in it. A number, stated once, clearly. And if you have a plan you genuinely think most people should pick, say so with a single quiet badge - not a card that's physically larger than its neighbors and shaking for attention.

Note
A useful test: read the page out loud to someone who's never seen it. If you find yourself saying "ignore that part, it's not really a discount," that part shouldn't be on the page.

Restraint here isn't just a style preference - it's a trust signal. A page that doesn't need to perform urgency is a page that's confident the product is worth the number written on it.